Final Portfolio
In English 112 this year, I believe I have worked hard enough to achieve an A. I can prove that I worked hard enough by displaying everything I have learned in English 112 and how I have improved my writing skills since English 111. I have only missed one English and History class this year so I have not missed the maximum amount until your letter grade drops. I have also turned in all my assignments in and on time. What I have learned and improved this year are the rhetorical knowledge, differences between primary and secondary sources and how to use them in P.E.A paragraphs, and group work, how to use the library to find primary and secondary sources and how to write a research paper.
In my first paragraph I will talk about how I have learned to use rhetorical knowledge in my paragraphs. Last year I learned that rhetorical knowledge was the study of how to accomplish your ends by using communications. I also learned about the rhetorical triangle of pathos, ethos, and logos (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-1.html). This year I used this triangle to help me get started and realize who I was writing my paper too. I used the triangle to determine that I am the author and have: agendas, goals, purposes, knowledge of what you’re writing about, and the conventions. You use these to create a message or craft which will be for a specific audience. The audience you will write for has specific expectations, and want to know how you will craft your message, the knowledge you have on the subject and what genre you will use (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-1.html). In history this year I had to write a paper and I used this philosophy to help me write it for both English and History and both professor‘s as my audiences. (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). In this paper I know that Dr. Damyo and Dr. Brandon were my audiences and I had to craft a message to get a good grade in History, but also used: correct grammar, set up my paragraphs well, and used the writing process; to get a good grade in English. I knew that I need my P.E.A paragraphs to give sufficient evidence to support my comparisons in my paragraphs. So to support my message I used quotes from the primary sources to prove to Dr. Demayo what I was comparing between the two sources were true. I also used the typical three body paragraph format to write my paper to show that I could use the writing process to do my history paper. I did a pre-draft (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/rough-draft.html) because that’s what my English professor wanted to see and was expecting from me and it helped me write my final copy. In this paper I had two audiences and found ways to please both of them by doing what they wanted to see and having my facts straight. Last year towards the end of the year I had a pretty good concept on the rhetoric thing, but wasn’t as skilled in how to include it in my papers as I am now (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/final-exam.html). I know now that I have to use all my information to satisfy both teachers and my favorite way of doing it has become the P.E.A paragraphs (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-9.html). I think that the P.E.A paragraphs are the best way to explain you to the audience. You give the point, show the evidence, and then analyze it. It is such a simple, yet effective way of writing. I have used the P.E.A technique in this paper, my final exam from last year, and also my paper earlier this year in English (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-9.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). In each of these papers you can tell that I make my point’s first then use quotes or links to show evidence to support my points. After each of the quotes you can see that I have written an analysis for each piece of evidence to prove why I used that evidence to support my points. I think that the P.E.A evidence gives the author the best opportunity to craft a reasonable and respectable point to the audience. When the audience reads it they can see where the evidence is coming from to support your ideas and determine whether it is a trustful site. In my papers I have only used trustful sources to get my ethos up so the teacher can believe me when I make my points. The quotes I got where from the primary source book and the other sources are from notes from my teacher. Both of those sources I have used makes my ethos go up so it makes it easier for my audience to trust me making it easier for me, the author, to get a better grade.
In my second paragraph I will be talking about how I have learned to use primary and secondary sources. This year I learned the difference between primary and secondary sources. Primary sources are written documents, or a picture, or actually an object from the original time period. A secondary source is something that someone else writes about to explain the person, place, or thing that happened in history. In my first paper this year I had to write a paper comparing and contrasting two primary sources. I used the primary sources in my primary source book for history. We had to use the two primary sources from that book. I used note cards to get quotes from the primary sources to use as evidence in my P.E.A paragraphs (insert quotes link). In the link you can see the quotes in my note cards and how I documented each page and source I got them from. I wrote the page number in the top right corner. The author and the source I got the information from in the top left corner of the note card. The quote is in the middle of the note card. In the primary sources I got quotes to use as evidence to write the paper. (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html ) In this paper you can see that the bracketed areas are my sources. Each of those proves a point to my paragraph that is later followed by an analysis. So using my primary sources helped me write my P.E.A paragraphs as well.
In my third paragraph I am going to talk about one of the biggest additions to English 112 this year. That is group work. In English 111 we had groups, but most of the time we did work on our own. This year in English 112 most of the work and in-class work is with our groups. During class we sit in our groups. We now have an upcoming project where our group comes up with a topic, but then we write our own paper with the group. The new group idea actually has helped a lot this year. What has helped the most is the analysis of each others thesis sentences. This has helped in many ways. You can look at your group member’s thesis statements and you try to find ways to improve it. Now that we have focused so much on thesis statements this year this activity has improved my thesis statement writing a lot (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/thesis-statement.html#comments). In my thesis statement there you can read the comments of my group me members and I actually used their comments to come up with a better thesis statement in my final copy of my paper for history (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). These new group exercises really help me out and everyone else out in the group. It makes writing papers a little bit easier with suggestions from outside readers. We also have a group three links posted on global learning community where we each wrote something about ourselves (http://globalconnectionslc.weebly.com/the-forum-s11.html). In the café I wrote something about myself to my other group members to explain why I am at J-sarge and what my goals are. Everyone else did the same and it was easier to get to know your classmates when you could go to the group cafes and read information about them. This really helped even more considering we do so many group activities this year. Also we had to post our history terms to our blogs(http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/british-east-india-empire.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/caravel.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/aztec-empire.html). Those are some of the terms I did and the rest are on my blog site. Each member of the group had a selected amount of terms and would have to find the who, what, when and why of each term. This really helps shoulder the work load and get good information for everyone to use on the history exam. The group activities have really helped out with me learning and getting work done.
The second half of the year the class mainly focused on the research paper. A new thing I learned by doing the research paper was how to use the library. In my first year at J-sarge the only time I went to the library was to find primary and secondary sources for my research paper. What helped me out a lot were the assignments you made us turn in that asked the questions about how to use the library and they showed you what to do. This made books a lot easier to find. I never knew how to even look up a book. Now I know I just have to go to the section, look at the side of the row and see what information is on the side of the sheet and know if that’s the info I want in that row. I also can use the computer to look up the keywords in books and that gives me the genre and ISBN number. Once I get that I go to the section and look up the ISBN and there is the book I need.
Finally the main thing we focused on the second year was our final research paper. This was our main focus because it was the only paper we had to write and Dr. Demayo and Dr. Brendon missed a few days due to sickness and that class Dr. Brandon was doing. In doing the research paper I learned how to use the library and how to incorporate my knowledge of primary and secondary sources to make my research paper. What we had to do was take a specific topic and use three secondary and one primary source to write about it. I did research on psychology and Germany for my research paper because our topic was Hitler’s psychological techniques on the Germans. In my research paper I used pictures as my primary sources to help explain past events that were going on (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/05/final-draft-research-paper.html) In the paper you can see the quotations I used to support evidence/ research to explain my points. Each point I used was some sort of psychological tactic that I found in one of the books. I then used the primary or secondary source to explain further on how he used that tactic and what it did. For instance I would use the psychological research books to explain the definition of the tactic in the psychological terms and then used the Nazi, Hitler books to explain how he used it and who he used it on (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/05/final-draft-research-paper.html). You can see in the first paragraph that I used selective antention as the psychological tactic Hitler was using. What I did next was get the definition from the book Psychology of Death. Then I showed examples of Hitler using it below with examples from the books Nazi Terror and Daily Life during the Holocaust. I used this tactic and the P.E.A paragraphs to write my history research paper and hopefully will get a good grade.
This year I haven’t learned a whole lot more of new information than last semester. What I have learned is how to incorporate that information into my paragraphs to improve my writing. For instance I have learned how to use rhetoric to whom that I am the author and have: agendas, goals, purposes, knowledge of what you’re writing about, and the conventions. You use these to create a message or craft which will be for a specific audience. The audiences you will write for has specific expectations, and want to know how you will craft your message, the knowledge you have on the subject and what genre you will use. Also I have learned the difference between primary and secondary sources and to use quotes to compare and contrast two primary sources. How to use the primary and secondary sources in a research paper. I even learned how to find the primary and secondary sources in the library. Group work has also been a big part of English 112 and helps everyone out in the groups with work. When you work together with groups it helps you get other opinions on your work to get the best ideas. Also you have others critiquing your work so you have someone looking over it before you turn it in for a final grade. It always nice to have someone else looks at your work because you never know what you might have missed or didn’t include.
Friday, May 6, 2011
Monday, May 2, 2011
Bibliography
Works Cited
Hunt, Morton. The Story of Pyschology. Broadway: Double Day, 1993.
Johnson, Eric A. Nazi Terror: the Gestapo, Jews, and Ordinary Germans. New York: Basic, 1999.
Kastenbaum, Robert, and Ruth Aisenberg. The Psychology of Death. New York: Springer Pub., 1972.
Nussbaum, Eve M., and Carol D. Schulz. Daily Life During The Holocaust. Wesport: Greenwood, 1998.
Final Draft Research Paper
Hitler’s Psychological Tactics Enforced on the Jews
The Nazi’s needed a way to get around six million Jews to concentration camps without the Jews starting riots, and German citizens not noticing. They way the Nazi’s were able to accomplish the German people to not notice was through selective inattention. The way the Nazis got the Jews to the concentration camps and for everyone to follow was through fear. He used propaganda to deceive the Germans and outside nations.
The next psychological technique Hitler used against the Jews was propaganda. Hitler used propaganda to deceive the people of Germany and the Jews. “Propaganda works on the general public from the standpoint of an idea and makes them ripe for the victory of this idea." (Hitler 1962). Hitler used sold the idea of anti-Semitism to the general public and told them if they got rid of the Jews that they would become a perfect race. He said that the Jews were brining them down. Germany wanted to achieve Hitler’s goal of perfection so they followed his lead. "The function of propaganda is to attract supporters, the function of organization to win members” (Hitler, 1924). So he used his propaganda to bring in members into the Nazi regime. When he got more members to believe in the same goal he did he moved onto his goal of exterminating the Jewish race. Hitler not only used propaganda to attract Germans. He also used the propaganda on other nations such as Czechoslovakia and Poland. This propaganda was used to show their political loyalty and race superiority to them. After the invasion of the Soviet Union, Nazi propaganda was directed to soldiers, people home, police officers, and non-German auxiliaries and it presented Germany as the defender of “Western” culture. Even in the newspaper there were political cartoons that were racial towards Jews (Picture, pg.43 Daily Life During the Holocaust). Hitler was doing everything in his power to get the people on his side and despise the Jewish race. Propaganda was a great way to spread that idea around rapidly. Everyone got the newspaper and the word spread quickly and as the days went on Hitler’s support grew by a little bit. He was tricking the German people and other nations in to believing in him.
During World War II, Adolph Hitler used anti-Semitism to unite the Nazi’s with Non-Germans. Hitler used concentration camps as a way to “fix” the problem with society. The main group he targeted was the Jews, but there were other groups: homosexuals, gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Freemasons, African Americans, even people with disabilities. The Nazi’s wanted to get the Jews to these concentration camps with out everyone in Germany knowing because they knew that not everyone would be “ok” with the camps. The psychological tactic that Hitler used was selective inattention. “It is developed from within, and utilized defensively by the individual to serve his or her own needs.” (The Psychology of Death, pg. 427) What happens is the people had an idea that the Jews were going somewhere they just choose to not believe what the camps where doing and just block it out. People would rather not comprehend the facts then actually knowing and living through the misery. It was an escape for people to get away from the horrible reality the Holocaust was. The reason people were doing this because they didn’t want to feel like they were letting their country down. “To screen out this sort of information before it fully registers upon thoughts and feelings is to contribute to one’s assent to the continued distress and vulnerability of many other citizens.”(The Psychology of Death, pg. 472) There was nothing really German citizens could do to prevent the concentration camps. The head power of Germany, Hitler, was in charge with the help of the Army. Hitler also threatened German lives if they decided to help the Jews hide away. You could risk your life for the Jews but that was part of the psychological mind game Hitler was using so that you would fear the consequences. Instead of trying to help out you just block it out and believe that there is nothing wrong and that the Jews are just going on vacation. Hitler brought a prevalent sense of optimism to Germany though. When people would go outside there were marches where people sang, dance, and then camped out on the countryside. (Picture in Life in Germany, pg.33). To help his cause even more he “expanded health, social security, and old age benefits. His public works included construction of a network of Autobahnen, reclamation of swamps and wastelands, and reforestation” (Life in Germany, pg. 33). Hitler was using this optimism to bring the attention of the camps and the anti-Semitism. There were some citizens who followed Hitler‘s ideas of anti-Semitism. Not everyone person blocked the concentration camps out, some people helped the Jews, some were for the camps. For instance Lydia Gottschewski praised what Hitler was doing. She was an organizer for many women organizations. She wrote in one newsletter “banish pity from your hearts when it comes to Jews.”(The Total Nazification of Germany, pg. 29). Her newsletter is in (Support from the Citizens, pg. 29). People that tried to help out would be the family that helped the Franks.
The way Hitler was able to get the Jews to the concentration camp without any riots were through fear. Fear was Hitler’s most valuable asset, because no one wanted to get shot by a soldier carrying machine guns. The Jews just got onto the trains not knowing where they were going until they arrived at the camps. When the Jews got to these camps they were forced to work in terrible conditions all day. The main purpose of this was for natural extermination. The Jews were frightened to die so they would do anything to stay alive. This was Hitler’s most powerful tactic and was the way he got the Jews to follow orders. The main objective of the Jews in the camps was to stay alive so they followed whatever rule or order. They believed if they could just make it through the camps by following orders they would eventually achieve freedom “forced oneself to believe life in camp was only temporary, that freedom would eventually come”(Coping with Life in a “Concentration” World, pg.108). By having the Jews fear death, but give them a little sense of hope they would do whatever the officers commanded them to do. One trick the Nazi’s used to show hope was they would have a guard at the showers so people wouldn’t get suspicious but when the got in he would leave and turn the gas on, killing the Jews. The Jews fear did not lead to any retaliation instead in did what Hitler wanted them to do follow orders. Also they made the appearance in the front of the camp likeable. They put flowers out front to make it seem like the place you where going to wasn’t too bad. Once you got into the camp though that thought process completely stopped. The camps were horrible and there were officers stationed everywhere with machine guns. They would line the Jews up and order them according to age and gender and maybe some other physical attributes. The Jews just thought they were going somewhere to work they could have never imagined that the concentration camps were going to be death camps.
The three psychological techniques Hitler used were selective inattention, fear, and propaganda. Each psychological technique helped his other techniques and that is why the holocaust was able to happen. If you didn’t support him through his propaganda techniques then you feared him or you just blocked out the realization of what was going on. Hitler’s psychological effect on Germany at this time was incredible. It is amazing that he was able to get a country to back him on such a horrible/racial idea. Hitler took advantage of the struggles of World War I to come to power and take over using his techniques. He spread his ideals around and ultimately became one of the worst tyrants of all time.
The Nazi’s needed a way to get around six million Jews to concentration camps without the Jews starting riots, and German citizens not noticing. They way the Nazi’s were able to accomplish the German people to not notice was through selective inattention. The way the Nazis got the Jews to the concentration camps and for everyone to follow was through fear. He used propaganda to deceive the Germans and outside nations.
The next psychological technique Hitler used against the Jews was propaganda. Hitler used propaganda to deceive the people of Germany and the Jews. “Propaganda works on the general public from the standpoint of an idea and makes them ripe for the victory of this idea." (Hitler 1962). Hitler used sold the idea of anti-Semitism to the general public and told them if they got rid of the Jews that they would become a perfect race. He said that the Jews were brining them down. Germany wanted to achieve Hitler’s goal of perfection so they followed his lead. "The function of propaganda is to attract supporters, the function of organization to win members” (Hitler, 1924). So he used his propaganda to bring in members into the Nazi regime. When he got more members to believe in the same goal he did he moved onto his goal of exterminating the Jewish race. Hitler not only used propaganda to attract Germans. He also used the propaganda on other nations such as Czechoslovakia and Poland. This propaganda was used to show their political loyalty and race superiority to them. After the invasion of the Soviet Union, Nazi propaganda was directed to soldiers, people home, police officers, and non-German auxiliaries and it presented Germany as the defender of “Western” culture. Even in the newspaper there were political cartoons that were racial towards Jews (Picture, pg.43 Daily Life During the Holocaust). Hitler was doing everything in his power to get the people on his side and despise the Jewish race. Propaganda was a great way to spread that idea around rapidly. Everyone got the newspaper and the word spread quickly and as the days went on Hitler’s support grew by a little bit. He was tricking the German people and other nations in to believing in him.
During World War II, Adolph Hitler used anti-Semitism to unite the Nazi’s with Non-Germans. Hitler used concentration camps as a way to “fix” the problem with society. The main group he targeted was the Jews, but there were other groups: homosexuals, gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Freemasons, African Americans, even people with disabilities. The Nazi’s wanted to get the Jews to these concentration camps with out everyone in Germany knowing because they knew that not everyone would be “ok” with the camps. The psychological tactic that Hitler used was selective inattention. “It is developed from within, and utilized defensively by the individual to serve his or her own needs.” (The Psychology of Death, pg. 427) What happens is the people had an idea that the Jews were going somewhere they just choose to not believe what the camps where doing and just block it out. People would rather not comprehend the facts then actually knowing and living through the misery. It was an escape for people to get away from the horrible reality the Holocaust was. The reason people were doing this because they didn’t want to feel like they were letting their country down. “To screen out this sort of information before it fully registers upon thoughts and feelings is to contribute to one’s assent to the continued distress and vulnerability of many other citizens.”(The Psychology of Death, pg. 472) There was nothing really German citizens could do to prevent the concentration camps. The head power of Germany, Hitler, was in charge with the help of the Army. Hitler also threatened German lives if they decided to help the Jews hide away. You could risk your life for the Jews but that was part of the psychological mind game Hitler was using so that you would fear the consequences. Instead of trying to help out you just block it out and believe that there is nothing wrong and that the Jews are just going on vacation. Hitler brought a prevalent sense of optimism to Germany though. When people would go outside there were marches where people sang, dance, and then camped out on the countryside. (Picture in Life in Germany, pg.33). To help his cause even more he “expanded health, social security, and old age benefits. His public works included construction of a network of Autobahnen, reclamation of swamps and wastelands, and reforestation” (Life in Germany, pg. 33). Hitler was using this optimism to bring the attention of the camps and the anti-Semitism. There were some citizens who followed Hitler‘s ideas of anti-Semitism. Not everyone person blocked the concentration camps out, some people helped the Jews, some were for the camps. For instance Lydia Gottschewski praised what Hitler was doing. She was an organizer for many women organizations. She wrote in one newsletter “banish pity from your hearts when it comes to Jews.”(The Total Nazification of Germany, pg. 29). Her newsletter is in (Support from the Citizens, pg. 29). People that tried to help out would be the family that helped the Franks.
The way Hitler was able to get the Jews to the concentration camp without any riots were through fear. Fear was Hitler’s most valuable asset, because no one wanted to get shot by a soldier carrying machine guns. The Jews just got onto the trains not knowing where they were going until they arrived at the camps. When the Jews got to these camps they were forced to work in terrible conditions all day. The main purpose of this was for natural extermination. The Jews were frightened to die so they would do anything to stay alive. This was Hitler’s most powerful tactic and was the way he got the Jews to follow orders. The main objective of the Jews in the camps was to stay alive so they followed whatever rule or order. They believed if they could just make it through the camps by following orders they would eventually achieve freedom “forced oneself to believe life in camp was only temporary, that freedom would eventually come”(Coping with Life in a “Concentration” World, pg.108). By having the Jews fear death, but give them a little sense of hope they would do whatever the officers commanded them to do. One trick the Nazi’s used to show hope was they would have a guard at the showers so people wouldn’t get suspicious but when the got in he would leave and turn the gas on, killing the Jews. The Jews fear did not lead to any retaliation instead in did what Hitler wanted them to do follow orders. Also they made the appearance in the front of the camp likeable. They put flowers out front to make it seem like the place you where going to wasn’t too bad. Once you got into the camp though that thought process completely stopped. The camps were horrible and there were officers stationed everywhere with machine guns. They would line the Jews up and order them according to age and gender and maybe some other physical attributes. The Jews just thought they were going somewhere to work they could have never imagined that the concentration camps were going to be death camps.
The three psychological techniques Hitler used were selective inattention, fear, and propaganda. Each psychological technique helped his other techniques and that is why the holocaust was able to happen. If you didn’t support him through his propaganda techniques then you feared him or you just blocked out the realization of what was going on. Hitler’s psychological effect on Germany at this time was incredible. It is amazing that he was able to get a country to back him on such a horrible/racial idea. Hitler took advantage of the struggles of World War I to come to power and take over using his techniques. He spread his ideals around and ultimately became one of the worst tyrants of all time.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Final Mid-term
English Mid-Term
For the first half of English 112 I believe I have worked hard enough to achieve an A. I can prove that I worked hard enough by displaying everything I have learned in English 112 and how I have improved my writing skills since English 111. I have only missed one English and History class this year so I have not missed the maximum amount until your letter grade drops. I have also turned in all my assignments in and on time. What I have learned and improved this semester are the rhetorical knowledge, differences between primary and secondary sources and how to use them in P.E.A paragraphs, and group work.
In my first paragraph I will talk about how I have learned to use rhetorical knowledge in my paragraphs. Last semester I learned that rhetorical knowledge was the study of how to accomplish your ends by using communications. I also learned about the rhetorical triangle of pathos, ethos, and logos (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-1.html). This semester I used this triangle to help me get started and realize who I was writing my paper too. I used the triangle to determine that I am the author and have: agendas, goals, purposes, knowledge of what you’re writing about, and the conventions. You use these to create a message or craft which will be for a specific audience. The audience you will write for has specific expectations, and want to know how you will craft your message, the knowledge you have on the subject and what genre you will use (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-1.html). In history this year I had to write a paper and I used this philosophy to help me write it for both English and History and both professor‘s as my audiences. (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). In this paper I know that Dr. Damyo and Dr. Brandon were my audiences and I had to craft a message to get a good grade in History, but also used: correct grammar, set up my paragraphs well, and used the writing process; to get a good grade in English. I knew that I need my P.E.A paragraphs to give sufficient evidence to support my comparisons in my paragraphs. So to support my message I used quotes from the primary sources to prove to Dr. Demayo what I was comparing between the two sources were true. I also used the typical three body paragraph format to write my paper to show that I could use the writing process to do my history paper. I did a pre-draft (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/rough-draft.html) because that’s what my English professor wanted to see and was expecting from me and it helped me write my final copy. In this paper I had two audiences and found ways to please both of them by doing what they wanted to see and having my facts straight. Last semester towards the end of the year I had a pretty good concept on the rhetoric thing, but wasn’t as skilled in how to include it in my papers as I am now (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/final-exam.html). I know now that I have to use all my information to satisfy both teachers and my favorite way of doing it has become the P.E.A paragraphs (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-9.html). I think that the P.E.A paragraphs are the best way to explain you to the audience. You give the point, show the evidence, and then analyze it. It is such a simple, yet effective way of writing. I have used the P.E.A technique in this paper, my final exam from last year, and also my paper earlier this year in English (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-9.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). In each of these papers you can tell that I make my point’s first then use quotes or links to show evidence to support my points. After each of the quotes you can see that I have written an analysis for each piece of evidence to prove why I used that evidence to support my points. I think that the P.E.A evidence gives the author the best opportunity to craft a reasonable and respectable point to the audience. When the audience reads it they can see where the evidence is coming from to support your ideas and determine whether it is a trustful site. In my papers I have only used trustful sources to get my ethos up so the teacher can believe me when I make my points. The quotes I got where from the primary source book and the other sources are from notes from my teacher. Both of those sources I have used makes my ethos go up so it makes it easier for my audience to trust me making it easier for me, the author, to get a better grade.
In my second paragraph I will be talking about how I have learned to use primary and secondary sources. This semester I learned the difference between primary and secondary sources. Primary sources are written documents, or a picture, or actually an object from the original time period. A secondary source is something that someone else writes about to explain the person, place, or thing that happened in history. In my first paper this semester I had to write a paper comparing and contrasting two primary sources. I used the primary sources in my primary source book for history. We had to use the two primary sources from that book. I used note cards to get quotes from the primary sources to use as evidence in my P.E.A paragraphs (insert quotes link). In the link you can see the quotes in my note cards and how I documented each page and source I got them from. I wrote the page number in the top right corner. The author and the source I got the information from in the top left corner of the note card. The quote is in the middle of the note card. In the primary sources I got quotes to use as evidence to write the paper. (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html ) In this paper you can see that the bracketed areas are my sources. Each of those proves a point to my paragraph that is later followed by an analysis. So using my primary sources helped me write my P.E.A paragraphs as well.
In my third paragraph I am going to talk about one of the biggest additions to English 112 this year. That is group work. In English 111 we had groups, but most of the time we did work on our own. This year in English 112 most of the work and in-class work is with our groups. During class we sit in our groups. We now have an upcoming project where our group comes up with a topic, but then we write our own paper with the group. The new group idea actually has helped a lot this year. What has helped the most is the analysis of each others thesis sentences. This has helped in many ways. You can look at your group member’s thesis statements and you try to find ways to improve it. Now that we have focused so much on thesis statements this semester this activity has improved my thesis statement writing a lot (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/thesis-statement.html#comments). In my thesis statement there you can read the comments of my group me members and I actually used their comments to come up with a better thesis statement in my final copy of my paper for history (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). These new group exercises really help me out and everyone else out in the group. It makes writing papers a little bit easier with suggestions from outside readers. We also have a group three links posted on global learning community where we each wrote something about ourselves (http://globalconnectionslc.weebly.com/the-forum-s11.html). In the café I wrote something about myself to my other group members to explain why I am at J-sarge and what my goals are. Everyone else did the same and it was easier to get to know your classmates when you could go to the group cafes and read information about them. This really helped even more considering we do so many group activities this year. Also we had to post our history terms to our blogs(http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/british-east-india-empire.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/caravel.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/aztec-empire.html). Those are some of the terms I did and the rest are on my blog site. Each member of the group had a selected amount of terms and would have to find the who, what, when and why of each term. This really helps shoulder the work load and get good information for everyone to use on the history exam. The group activities have really helped out with me learning and getting work done.
This semester I haven’t learned a whole lot more of new information than last semester. What I have learned is how to incorporate that information into my paragraphs to improve my writing. For instance I have learned how to use rhetoric to whom that I am the author and have: agendas, goals, purposes, knowledge of what you’re writing about, and the conventions. You use these to create a message or craft which will be for a specific audience. The audiences you will write for has specific expectations, and want to know how you will craft your message, the knowledge you have on the subject and what genre you will use. Also I have learned the difference between primary and secondary sources and to use quotes to compare and contrast two primary sources. Group work has also been a big part of English 112 and helps everyone out in the groups with work. When you work together with groups it helps you get other opinions on your work to get the best ideas. Also you have others critiquing your work so you have someone looking over it before you turn it in for a final grade. It always nice to have someone else looks at your work because you never know what you might have missed or didn’t include.
For the first half of English 112 I believe I have worked hard enough to achieve an A. I can prove that I worked hard enough by displaying everything I have learned in English 112 and how I have improved my writing skills since English 111. I have only missed one English and History class this year so I have not missed the maximum amount until your letter grade drops. I have also turned in all my assignments in and on time. What I have learned and improved this semester are the rhetorical knowledge, differences between primary and secondary sources and how to use them in P.E.A paragraphs, and group work.
In my first paragraph I will talk about how I have learned to use rhetorical knowledge in my paragraphs. Last semester I learned that rhetorical knowledge was the study of how to accomplish your ends by using communications. I also learned about the rhetorical triangle of pathos, ethos, and logos (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-1.html). This semester I used this triangle to help me get started and realize who I was writing my paper too. I used the triangle to determine that I am the author and have: agendas, goals, purposes, knowledge of what you’re writing about, and the conventions. You use these to create a message or craft which will be for a specific audience. The audience you will write for has specific expectations, and want to know how you will craft your message, the knowledge you have on the subject and what genre you will use (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-1.html). In history this year I had to write a paper and I used this philosophy to help me write it for both English and History and both professor‘s as my audiences. (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). In this paper I know that Dr. Damyo and Dr. Brandon were my audiences and I had to craft a message to get a good grade in History, but also used: correct grammar, set up my paragraphs well, and used the writing process; to get a good grade in English. I knew that I need my P.E.A paragraphs to give sufficient evidence to support my comparisons in my paragraphs. So to support my message I used quotes from the primary sources to prove to Dr. Demayo what I was comparing between the two sources were true. I also used the typical three body paragraph format to write my paper to show that I could use the writing process to do my history paper. I did a pre-draft (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/rough-draft.html) because that’s what my English professor wanted to see and was expecting from me and it helped me write my final copy. In this paper I had two audiences and found ways to please both of them by doing what they wanted to see and having my facts straight. Last semester towards the end of the year I had a pretty good concept on the rhetoric thing, but wasn’t as skilled in how to include it in my papers as I am now (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/final-exam.html). I know now that I have to use all my information to satisfy both teachers and my favorite way of doing it has become the P.E.A paragraphs (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-9.html). I think that the P.E.A paragraphs are the best way to explain you to the audience. You give the point, show the evidence, and then analyze it. It is such a simple, yet effective way of writing. I have used the P.E.A technique in this paper, my final exam from last year, and also my paper earlier this year in English (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2010/12/image-9.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). In each of these papers you can tell that I make my point’s first then use quotes or links to show evidence to support my points. After each of the quotes you can see that I have written an analysis for each piece of evidence to prove why I used that evidence to support my points. I think that the P.E.A evidence gives the author the best opportunity to craft a reasonable and respectable point to the audience. When the audience reads it they can see where the evidence is coming from to support your ideas and determine whether it is a trustful site. In my papers I have only used trustful sources to get my ethos up so the teacher can believe me when I make my points. The quotes I got where from the primary source book and the other sources are from notes from my teacher. Both of those sources I have used makes my ethos go up so it makes it easier for my audience to trust me making it easier for me, the author, to get a better grade.
In my second paragraph I will be talking about how I have learned to use primary and secondary sources. This semester I learned the difference between primary and secondary sources. Primary sources are written documents, or a picture, or actually an object from the original time period. A secondary source is something that someone else writes about to explain the person, place, or thing that happened in history. In my first paper this semester I had to write a paper comparing and contrasting two primary sources. I used the primary sources in my primary source book for history. We had to use the two primary sources from that book. I used note cards to get quotes from the primary sources to use as evidence in my P.E.A paragraphs (insert quotes link). In the link you can see the quotes in my note cards and how I documented each page and source I got them from. I wrote the page number in the top right corner. The author and the source I got the information from in the top left corner of the note card. The quote is in the middle of the note card. In the primary sources I got quotes to use as evidence to write the paper. (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html ) In this paper you can see that the bracketed areas are my sources. Each of those proves a point to my paragraph that is later followed by an analysis. So using my primary sources helped me write my P.E.A paragraphs as well.
In my third paragraph I am going to talk about one of the biggest additions to English 112 this year. That is group work. In English 111 we had groups, but most of the time we did work on our own. This year in English 112 most of the work and in-class work is with our groups. During class we sit in our groups. We now have an upcoming project where our group comes up with a topic, but then we write our own paper with the group. The new group idea actually has helped a lot this year. What has helped the most is the analysis of each others thesis sentences. This has helped in many ways. You can look at your group member’s thesis statements and you try to find ways to improve it. Now that we have focused so much on thesis statements this semester this activity has improved my thesis statement writing a lot (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/thesis-statement.html#comments). In my thesis statement there you can read the comments of my group me members and I actually used their comments to come up with a better thesis statement in my final copy of my paper for history (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/02/final-draft.html). These new group exercises really help me out and everyone else out in the group. It makes writing papers a little bit easier with suggestions from outside readers. We also have a group three links posted on global learning community where we each wrote something about ourselves (http://globalconnectionslc.weebly.com/the-forum-s11.html). In the café I wrote something about myself to my other group members to explain why I am at J-sarge and what my goals are. Everyone else did the same and it was easier to get to know your classmates when you could go to the group cafes and read information about them. This really helped even more considering we do so many group activities this year. Also we had to post our history terms to our blogs(http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/british-east-india-empire.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/caravel.html) (http://ryanjacoby.blogspot.com/2011/03/aztec-empire.html). Those are some of the terms I did and the rest are on my blog site. Each member of the group had a selected amount of terms and would have to find the who, what, when and why of each term. This really helps shoulder the work load and get good information for everyone to use on the history exam. The group activities have really helped out with me learning and getting work done.
This semester I haven’t learned a whole lot more of new information than last semester. What I have learned is how to incorporate that information into my paragraphs to improve my writing. For instance I have learned how to use rhetoric to whom that I am the author and have: agendas, goals, purposes, knowledge of what you’re writing about, and the conventions. You use these to create a message or craft which will be for a specific audience. The audiences you will write for has specific expectations, and want to know how you will craft your message, the knowledge you have on the subject and what genre you will use. Also I have learned the difference between primary and secondary sources and to use quotes to compare and contrast two primary sources. Group work has also been a big part of English 112 and helps everyone out in the groups with work. When you work together with groups it helps you get other opinions on your work to get the best ideas. Also you have others critiquing your work so you have someone looking over it before you turn it in for a final grade. It always nice to have someone else looks at your work because you never know what you might have missed or didn’t include.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
British East India Empire
The East India Empire was in the late 17th century. It was an English joint stock componay that was used to trade with east India. It was in Britian. It was important because it allowed the British to establish trade with India. It also opened up trade with the Chinese as well. It allowed Birtian to obtain goods like silk, cotton, indigo, salt, tea, and opium. This allowed the Chinese to spread to Britian and vice verse.
Caravel
The caravel was a ship used in the 15th century. The caravel was a small and highly manueverable ship. It was used to sail the West African coast and Atlantic Ocean. They were important because it allowed the Portugese to do a lot of exploring and get into shallower waters where big ships couldn't reach.
Aztec Empire
The Aztech Empire was during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries. It was an empire that dominated large parts of mesoamerica. It was in Mesoamerica. It was important because it was the strongest and longest lasting empires in Mesoamerica. The Aztech culture was had rich and complex religious and mythological traditions.
Atlantic System
The American System was from the 1600's to the late 1800's. The triangle trade was when slaves where being traded to the New world. The slaves were taken from Africa to Euroupe then traded to North and South America. It is important because it was the first time slaves came to be. The slaves were there to labor coffe, gold mines, cotton, rice fields, timber, or in houses to do work around the house. This also was a cause of the civil war.
American Revolution
The American Revolution took place in the 18th century. It was a political upheval when the 13 colonies decided to break free from the British Empire. It took place in North America. It was important because the colonies were freed from the British tryannay and were their own country now. It was the battled that got their independence.
Monday, February 28, 2011
Outline for Mid-Term
Thesis- This year in English 112 I believe I have learned and worked hard enough for an A for the first half of the semester. I have learned a lot more this first semester and have improved my unpolished skills from English 111. I have learned how to use rhetoric more in depth in my essays, how to use the writing process to my advantage, difference between primary and secondary sources, how to write good thesis statements.
First Paragraph-
Use my essay i wrote in English and History to show how I used rhetoric to my advantage by knowing who the author was to write my message and publish it. Explain the rhetorical triangle. Use my notes to explain it and use paragraphs to go more in depth and use examples.
Second Paragraph-
The writing process is a big improvement I have made. It has made me realize that I can use pre-writing to help me write my papers. I also have the process in my notes and can use that to show that I have the process down.
Third Paragraph-
I have learned a lot about primary and secondary sources. In my last paper I used both to give evidence to support my idea. I have note cards to show where I got the quotes from. I can use both that paragraph, the black book, primary source book and notes to give evidence to this paragraph.
Fourth Paragraph-
Thesis analysis- I have improved my thesis writing. We have done a lot of work on the thesises this year. We have done some out of class assignments as well as in class assignments. I also wrote a thesis on my first paragraph and it was pretty strong.
Fifth Paragrph-
Conclusion that sums up everything I have learned.
First Paragraph-
Use my essay i wrote in English and History to show how I used rhetoric to my advantage by knowing who the author was to write my message and publish it. Explain the rhetorical triangle. Use my notes to explain it and use paragraphs to go more in depth and use examples.
Second Paragraph-
The writing process is a big improvement I have made. It has made me realize that I can use pre-writing to help me write my papers. I also have the process in my notes and can use that to show that I have the process down.
Third Paragraph-
I have learned a lot about primary and secondary sources. In my last paper I used both to give evidence to support my idea. I have note cards to show where I got the quotes from. I can use both that paragraph, the black book, primary source book and notes to give evidence to this paragraph.
Fourth Paragraph-
Thesis analysis- I have improved my thesis writing. We have done a lot of work on the thesises this year. We have done some out of class assignments as well as in class assignments. I also wrote a thesis on my first paragraph and it was pretty strong.
Fifth Paragrph-
Conclusion that sums up everything I have learned.
Pre-Writing For Portfolio
Ideas-
Rhetorical Triangle
Group Work
Thesis Analysis
Blog
Primary Sources
Rhetorical Triangle
Group Work
Thesis Analysis
Blog
Primary Sources
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Final Draft
Ryan Jacoby
Dr. Brandon and Dr. DeMayo
History and English 112
2/17/11
Viewpoints on Religion through Government
In both of my primary sources conflicts with religion and government appear. Martin Luther and Emperor Kangxi both criticize other religions through government. Martin Luther wants to separate the Christian belief from the law of the earth, while Emperor Kangxi just flat out believes the Catholic faith is faulty.
In Martin Luther's “Protestant Reformation” he criticizes the Christians for wanting to combine their faith with law. Martin Luther does not hold the popular belief of allowing Church and State. He believes that Christian beliefs are a problem to people in society. Martin says "We must reject those who so highly boast of Moses Laws, as to temporal affairs, for we have our written imperial and country laws, under which we live, and unto which we are sworn."(Of the Law and the Gospel, pg. 661). Martin Luther is trying to say those that put God before the law is wrong and that they should be rejected. The law is the law and that is why they have separation of church and state because of different religions. Martin is trying to explain that Christians need to learn how to separate these two matters. He says, "All Christians should learn rightly to discern the law and grace in their hearts, and know how to keep one from the other in deed and in truth, not merely in words, as the pope and other luceties do, which mingle them together, and, as it were, make a cake not fit to eat."(Of the Law and the Gospel, pg. 662) Again Martin Luther is saying that the Christians should not intertwine religion and government. The two just don't mix. Everyone has to follow the law, but not everyone has the same religious beliefs as the Christians. He wants the Christians to be able to follow the law of the country, but they can also worship their God. Martin Luther doesn’t have a problem with the actual religion itself he just doesn’t like how the Christians believe the laws should revolve around the Christian beliefs. Everyone is not the same religion so why would you base the law of the land off of one faith it just doesn’t make any sense and I see where Martin Luther is coming from. I know he is not a Catholic and probably thinks that some of their viewpoints are not good for making decisions on how laws should be enforced. He says, “We must make a clear distinction; we must place the gospel in heaven, and leave the law on earth” (Of the Law and Gospel, pg. 662). This is the quote that best summarizes everything he is saying. Just leave Christian views with God and God only, but your views of the law shouldn’t be biased toward religion and that should be the law here on earth.
In the next primary source Emperor Kangxi talks about religion as well. Emperor Kangxi holds the popular belief about religion because he is the emperor of China and everyone follows him. Westerners have come to China to spread the Catholic faith. He starts to mistrust the missionaries because some of them are there just to make money. Emperor Kangxi says, "Besides these meddlers there are also those out for profit, greedy traders, who would not be allowed to live here."(Emperor Kangxi on Religion, pg. 640). He is getting up set with the immigrants coming from Europe either trying to make money or spread the Catholic Faith. He has to stricken the law so he can keep an eye on all the immigrants. The Catholics with the certificates have strict rules though to what they can do. They are allowed to preach but the Chinese have the choice of listening. If the Chinese officials believe they are stirring up trouble they can take away the certificates. “The Chinese stricken the rules on Christians and Christians were required to have a certificate to preach"(Emperor Kangxi on Religion, pg. 640). Emperor Kangxi is trying to get a hold of all the immigrants. He does that by putting them all in one area and making sure the missionaries have certificates so they know that they are real. Emperor Kangxi has a little bit of tolerance for the religion but just can't understand it. “I had asked Verbiest why God had not forgiven his son without making him die, but though he had tried to answer I had not understood him” (Emperor Kangxi on Religion, pg. 641). The Emperor tries to understand the Catholic religion but the missionaries cannot explain the miracles or Jesus’s death to him, so he has no reason to believe it. He doesn't get too upset with the missionaries who are trying to spread the catholic faith, but is more upset at the greedy men who pretend to be missionaries to make money. Emperor Kangxi does not hate people who are Catholic faith he just believes that some of their religion doesn’t make sense. One reason why he lets the missionaries preach the Catholic faith is because some of their words were just like the teachings of Buddhist and Taoists, “Yet some of their words were no different from the world or improper teachings of Buddhist or Taoists, and why should they be treated differently.”(Emperor Kangxi on Religion, pg. 641) Emperor Kangxi is softening up to the Catholic faith a little bit because he sees some similarities between his religion and the Catholic religion. He still believes the Catholic faith is wrong he just doesn’t detest them.
Emperor Kangxi and Martin Luther both criticize religion in their primary sources. Martin Luther didn't want religion and government to mix. While Emperor Kangxi, head of the government, gives his view on another religion. Emperor Kangxi does not agree with the other religion but has a little more tolerance for it than Martin Luther does. Martin Luther just thinks mixing religion with government is plain dumb and that Christians need a find to separate their religion from their political views. Martin Luther and Emperor Kangxi both talk about a similar religion that came from the same roots. The Catholic and Christian faith are almost identical, with very few differences. They both don't agree with the religious teachings of those faith and talk about how they are wrong. The main difference is the tolerance Emperor Kangxi has on the Catholic faith compared to Martin Luther’s hatred of those who can’t separate their religious views from their political views. Also Emperor Kangxi focuses more on how the Catholic faith beliefs are wrong, while Martin Luther beliefs using the Christian faith as a guideline for the laws are wrong.
Martin Luther and Kangxi are similar in giving their view point on religion through government. They have many differences on how they go about it. Martin Luther has no patience with the beliefs of Christians that think that their faith should be the guideline for the law. Emperor Kangxi actually gives the Catholic faith a chance. Martin Luther is not in the majority for his belief and is trying to get everyone else to follow him. Emperor Kangxi is the emperor and everyone has to follow what he says so his belief is the majority. Another difference is how Kangxi beliefs that the Catholic faith is faulty and that people can’t explain to him the reasoning behind their faith. Martin Luther is not so much worried about beliefs just using the Christian beliefs with the law.
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Rough Draft
Martin Luther and Emperor Kangxi both criticize other religions through government. Martin Luther criticizes the Christians that combine their faith with government while Emperor Kangxi criticizes the Catholic faith.
In Martin Luther's protestant reformation he criticizes law and religion. He believes that Christian beliefs are a problem to people in society. Martin says " We must reject those who so highly boast of Moses Laws, as to temporal affairs, for we have our written imperial and country laws, under which we live, and unto which we are sworn." Martin Luther is trying to say those that put God before the law are wrong and that they should be rejected. The Law is the Law and that is why they have separation of church and state because of different religions. Martin try's to explain that Christians need to learn how to separate these two matter. He says, " All Christians should learn rightly to discern the law and grace in their hearts, and know how to keep one from the other in deed and in truth, not merely in words, as the pope and other luceties do, who mingle them together, and, as it were, make a cake not fit to eat." Again Martin Luther is trying to explain to the Christians you should not intertwine religion and government. The two just don't mix. Everyone has to follow the law, but not everyone has the same religious beliefs as the Christians. He wants the Christians to be able to follow the law of the country, but they can also worship their God. He just doesn't want faith to mix with government.
In the next primary source Emperor Kangxi talks about religion as well. Emperor Kangxi is the emperor of China, therefore runs the government of China. Westerners have come to China to spread the Catholic faith. He starts to mistrust the missionaries because some of them are there just to make money. Emperor Kangxi says, "Besides these meddlers there are also those out for profit, greedy traders, who would not be allowed to live here." He is getting up set with the immigrants coming from Europe either trying to make money or spread the Catholic Faith. He has to stricken the law so he can keep an eye on all the immigrants, " The Chinese stricken the rules on Christians and Christians were required to have a certificate to preach". Emperor Kangxi is trying to get a hold of all the immigrants. He does that by putting them all in one are and making sure the missionaries have certificates so they know that they are real. Emperor Kangxi has a little bit of tolerance for the religion but just can't understand it. The Emperor tries to understand the Catholic religion but they cannot explain their miracles or Jesus's death to him so he has no reason to believe it. He doesn't get too upset with the missionaries who are trying to spread the catholic faith but, is more upset at the greedy men who pretend to be missionaries to make money.
Emperor Kangxi and Martin Luther both criticize religion in their primary sources. Martin Luther didn't want religion and government to mix. While Emperor Kangxi, head of the government, gives his view on another religion. Emperor Kangxi does not agree with the other religion but has a little more tolerance for it than Martin Luther does. Martin Luther just thinks mixing religion with government is plain dumb and that Christians need a find a way to do both. Martin Luther and Emperor Kangxi both talk about a similar religion that came from the same roots. The Catholic and Christian faith are almost identical, with very few differences. They both don't agree with the religious teachings of those faith and talk about how they are wrong. The main difference is the tolerance Emperor Kangzxi has compared to Martin Luther.
In Martin Luther's protestant reformation he criticizes law and religion. He believes that Christian beliefs are a problem to people in society. Martin says " We must reject those who so highly boast of Moses Laws, as to temporal affairs, for we have our written imperial and country laws, under which we live, and unto which we are sworn." Martin Luther is trying to say those that put God before the law are wrong and that they should be rejected. The Law is the Law and that is why they have separation of church and state because of different religions. Martin try's to explain that Christians need to learn how to separate these two matter. He says, " All Christians should learn rightly to discern the law and grace in their hearts, and know how to keep one from the other in deed and in truth, not merely in words, as the pope and other luceties do, who mingle them together, and, as it were, make a cake not fit to eat." Again Martin Luther is trying to explain to the Christians you should not intertwine religion and government. The two just don't mix. Everyone has to follow the law, but not everyone has the same religious beliefs as the Christians. He wants the Christians to be able to follow the law of the country, but they can also worship their God. He just doesn't want faith to mix with government.
In the next primary source Emperor Kangxi talks about religion as well. Emperor Kangxi is the emperor of China, therefore runs the government of China. Westerners have come to China to spread the Catholic faith. He starts to mistrust the missionaries because some of them are there just to make money. Emperor Kangxi says, "Besides these meddlers there are also those out for profit, greedy traders, who would not be allowed to live here." He is getting up set with the immigrants coming from Europe either trying to make money or spread the Catholic Faith. He has to stricken the law so he can keep an eye on all the immigrants, " The Chinese stricken the rules on Christians and Christians were required to have a certificate to preach". Emperor Kangxi is trying to get a hold of all the immigrants. He does that by putting them all in one are and making sure the missionaries have certificates so they know that they are real. Emperor Kangxi has a little bit of tolerance for the religion but just can't understand it. The Emperor tries to understand the Catholic religion but they cannot explain their miracles or Jesus's death to him so he has no reason to believe it. He doesn't get too upset with the missionaries who are trying to spread the catholic faith but, is more upset at the greedy men who pretend to be missionaries to make money.
Emperor Kangxi and Martin Luther both criticize religion in their primary sources. Martin Luther didn't want religion and government to mix. While Emperor Kangxi, head of the government, gives his view on another religion. Emperor Kangxi does not agree with the other religion but has a little more tolerance for it than Martin Luther does. Martin Luther just thinks mixing religion with government is plain dumb and that Christians need a find a way to do both. Martin Luther and Emperor Kangxi both talk about a similar religion that came from the same roots. The Catholic and Christian faith are almost identical, with very few differences. They both don't agree with the religious teachings of those faith and talk about how they are wrong. The main difference is the tolerance Emperor Kangzxi has compared to Martin Luther.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Thesis Statement
Martin Luther and Emperor Kangxi both criticize other religions through government. Martin Luther criticizes that Christians that combine their faith with government while Emperor Kangxi criticizes the Catholic faith.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)